China Files WTO Complaint Against India EV Subsidies
India’s EV subsidies are under global scrutiny as China files a WTO complaint, claiming these programs favor Indian companies over foreign competitors.

China has brought India to the World Trade Organization (WTO) for a complaint about the provision of India’s battery and electric vehicle (EV) subsidies. The complaint argues that India’s subsidy programs are in breach of international trade rules and have a discriminatory effect against foreign companies, particularly Chinese firms.
India’s initiatives to create a substantive EV manufacturing industry have drawn attention from countries around the world. Through subsidies under the production-linked incentive (PLI) program, local manufacturing is being ramped up. China argues that these subsidies violate WTO obligations to grant national treatment and are countervailing import substitution subsidies.
More details on the WTO dispute
India’s Push to Boost Domestic EV Manufacturing
PLI program aims to incentivize companies to manufacture a number of critical components locally and avoid importing technology. India’s ambition to develop EVs and the manufacturing industry is regarded as particularly important to India’s economy and national security.
The subsidies give an advantage to local producers over foreign companies, which has raised alarm in China. Indian subsidies induce greater investment in green energy and new car technologies.
India aims to develop domestic champions in high-growth sectors. Increasingly, India is seen as a potential world manufacturing base. Finance is being attracted to the Indian market, and domestic value-added is steadily increasing.
China’s Industrial Playbook Under Attack
It is ironic that China is facing this challenge because it used the very same tactics to trump global manufacturing. For decades, China utilized massive subsidies, low-cost credit, preferential land, and protectionist policies to grow its industries. China hammered world markets with low-cost goods, putting foreign competitors out of business. Today, India is using its own scaled-back version of this approach. However, ‘firm guardrails’ have been put in place, unlike in the Chinese model, where predatory pricing was the norm.
China’s protests may be more about competition than high principle. Chinese EV makers have overcapacity domestically and have seen demand start to dwindle. Export markets, India’s specifically, are important lifelines for Chinese firms, and their need to be attentive to Indian domestic incentives will increase.
India’s Strategic Industrial Transition
India’s industrial policy has changed as well. The state actively now plays a role in mobilizing and intersecting economic activity in major sectors. This shift is an imitation of parts of the Chinese model. However, India’s form of the transition is framed in a more open and non-predatory model.
India’s development in the EV and battery sectors is now of great importance in the energy transition and mobility of the future. Moreover, India’s development could change global supply chains outside of its region. China, once viewed as the standard, is now being integrated into a more regional system.
China’s WTO Dispute Indicates India’s Development
China needs to seek consultations to formally initiate a full WTO dispute. Such action reflects India’s developing seriousness.
Although India is not yet China-sized, the complaint demonstrates the developing awareness of India’s promise.
India’s manufacturing policies are on the global radar screen! Domestic firms become more confident, and foreign investments re-evaluate their plans.
A WTO dispute indicates India’s transformation from a technology consumer to a potential global competitor in green technology.
China’s WTO complaint underlies India’s policies, which are beginning to work. The world is witnessing India proactively being active on manufacturing policy.
India fills in the gap with dynamic factories producing advanced green technology, learns from China, while remaining sovereign and protecting strategic priority interests in technology and energy.
India EV Subsidies Strengthen National Manufacturing
The industrial initiative of India strengthens self-reliance and advances economic growth and innovation in strategic sectors, despite any resistance from global rivals. Ongoing policy implementation by India reflects long-term ambition and strategic confidence.
India’s EV and battery plans reflect more than just economic planning: they represent steps toward global competitiveness and national security.
China’s reactions show that India’s strategy is validated and enhances the nation’s growing status as a manufacturing powerhouse.