United States President Donald Trump has unveiled a proposal for a record-high military budget to increase U.S. defense expenditure to $1.5 trillion by 2027, which will mark a rise of over 50% from the current United States defense budget of $901 billion.
Trump revealed the plan through social media, saying there was a need for the sharp increase since the United States is experiencing “very troubled and dangerous times.” With the new budget, Washington would have the opportunity of building a “dream military” for the purpose of defending itself against any particular enemy, as stated by Trump.
“This will KEEP US SAFE and SECURE, no matter the enemy,” Trump tweeted, adding that funds from tariffs would allow the country to reach $1.5 trillion “without much strain.”
A historic increase in U.S. military expenditures
This plan by Trump is set to send the American defense expenditure to heights the country has never witnessed in the past. These levels will be exceeded since the plan will add more than $600 billion at a time when the country has been experiencing growth in defense expenditure through incremental increases.
Although Republicans have slim margins of party control in Congress on Capitol Hill, Democrats would certainly need congressional authorization to put this new policy into effect. Historically, Congress has been loathe to oppose any increases to military spending, but such growth under Trump’s budget has certainly raised plenty of red flags.
Trump has been maintaining that the expansion will be financed partly by funds that the tariffs will generate.
The proposed budget is being put forward against the background of an ever-increasing reliance by the Trump government on military might to pursue its foreign policy agenda.
In recent days, it was reported that “the US military is always an option” in talks about seizing control of Greenland, although US Secretary of State Marco Rubio has denied that an invasion would take place.
US forces have also confiscated two oil tankers that sailed through the Atlantic Ocean and the Caribbean due to sanctions law violations. In a more dramatic turn of events, US forces launched a midnight ambush that led to the arrest of Venezuelan leader Nicolas Maduro along with his wife from a military base – one of the boldest US actions against a Latin America country in several decades.
Collectively, these steps represent an expression of Trump’s conviction that the need for military superiority exists in order for the US to maintain its status and ensure international compliance.
Trump turns on defence contractors
As well as persuing a historic level for defense spending, Trump has also set his sights on the big US defense manufacturers themselves. He has accused them of being more interested in maximizing profits for investors than in taking the best possible care of the USA’s defenses.
In a subsequent posting, Trump had criticized defence contractors for paying high dividends and stock buybacks, instead of spending on facilities and capacity. The president had also said that he might cap pay for corporate leaders at $5 million a year, unless contractors build more facilities and expedite delivery of weapons.
The stock of large defence contractors like Lockheed Martin, General Dynamics, and Northrop Grumman Corporation experienced steep declines in the wake of these announcements.
Trump specifically called out Raytheon because it was “the least responsive” firm to the needs of the Pentagon and warned that the Pentagon’s defense contracts would be lost if the firm did not increase production and readiness spending.
ALSO READ: How Supreme Court POCSO Misuse Cases Expose Flaws in Age Verification and Bail Process
Concerns about debts & political repercussions
Budget analysts strongly oppose this proposal. Taxpayers for Common Sense, a non-partisan group in Washington, said this plan would significantly worsen the national finances.
At present, the U.S. already has more than 38 trillion dollars in national debt, and it is even suggested that this defense spending policy could be adding to the acceleration of the national debt crisis.
It also disputed the claim argued by Trump, stating that the tariffs will fund the rise in the increase. This is because the funding will also be used in other sectors like the reduction of the deficit, as well as payment to the citizen.
What the proposal signals
A budget of $1.5 trillion is not only an expenditure request. It’s also an expression of strategic vision that places a premium on might, on pressure, on economic warfare, rather than on restraint or joint resolution.” Thus spoke Donald Trump, unveiling his budget plans at the Pentagon. This is going to be so big
Well-meaning individuals regard the agreement as a way of reacting to the increasing unpredictability of the world and the re-emergence of great power rivalries. Opposition groups justifiably regard the agreement as financially irresponsible and an indicator of the securitization of the US foreign policy.
Whether Congress will sign on or contain the plan, the signal is already clear: the United States is going to demonstrate its power through unmitigated strength—and is willing to pay a historic premium in the process under the Trump administration.
FOR MORE: https://civiclens.in/category/international-news/
About the Author
