Budget 2026 education skills priorities shift toward quality and employability, but spending levels raise questions about long-term commitment. The 2026-2027 Budget reconceives education and skills as part of infrastructure. The budget acknowledges quality learning over just providing access to education. The language of the policy is in alignment with that of the Economic Survey.
However, spending priorities continue to show more caution than transformation. Education and skilling are still under three per cent of expenditure. While absolute allocations increase, there is no change in comparative commitment.
The budget shifts rhetoric from access to increased productivity and employability from improved skills. The connection between skills and logistics for AI is clear in the way the government is framing skills within its response to workforce shortages created by changing demographics and labour demand.
In addition, the budget creates significant challenges for skill development, ranking lower than education, defence, or transport in the expenditure hierarchy. Midyear cuts continue to be a significant barrier to creating confidence and continuity in the system. Ultimately, the success in achieving the outcomes will be dependent upon execution and the capacity of states to implement and deliver programs to their citizens.
What Budget 2026 education skills funding supports and sidelines
Under the budget, the education allocation will increase to ₹1.39 lakh crore. Most of the increases in the allocation will be made for school education programmes. A significant portion of the increase will be allocated to Atal Tinkering Labs. The primary reason behind this increase is due to the initiatives targeting innovation and early exposure to STEM. However, traditional universities will receive limited supplemental funding. The budget does not provide for significant systemic changes but targets an overall goal of achieving fifty percent gross enrollment of 18-23 year-olds.
The Economic Survey states that traditional universities are now competing against digital platforms for their share of the higher education market and expressly notes that as the quality of both content and instruction become the primary performance measures for all educational institutions, performance-based funding will extend to include learning-centred funding created to provide learners with direct access to their educational funds at any educational institution, irrespective of the ownership of that institution or its historical reputation etc., and that these trends will create much confusion and uncertainty regarding the ownership, geographic location, historical reputation and other attributes typically associated with education institutions and programmes. Despite these dire circumstances, authorities will continue to limit funding for all colleges.
Skill development, execution risks, and the real test
After 12 months of cutbacks, skill investment is regaining strength very quickly. However, skill investment is still less than 0.2% of total spending. The budget proposes major increases to ITI upgrades and flagship programs. The budget fails to provide adequate attention to trainer quality and measurement of training outcomes. States must translate budget allocations into improvements within the classroom. Under the Constitution, Education is a state subject.
Delayed budget releases and underspending on skills could limit the potential impact of the budget. The budget indicates an intention to promote quality, but will not change how funds are distributed. Investments to improve education quality must be consistent and ongoing, rather than sporadic.
For more- https://civiclens.in/category/national-news-civiclens-in/
About the Author
