Warner Brothers, a company that has been in business for a whole century with such legendary franchises as Looney Tunes, Batman, and Harry Potter, recently put out a tender invitation for bids in relation to purchasing their legendary film studio. There was a celebratory moment when it seemed that the winning race in this acquisition spree was won by Netflix with a mind-blowing offer of $72 billion. This sweet victory proved to be a mere honeymoon period as all of it fell apart in a most shocking way.
Paramount Skydance (PSKY), which has been financed by Jared Kushner, as well as Saudi and Qatar sovereign wealth funds, has surprised all with an $118 billion all-cash hostile takeover offer for the entire company. The size of this acquisition has ensured that this acquisition has turned into a procedural drama. Paramount Skydance CEO David Ellison has ensured that he has a plan in place for making Hollywood a secure place with a thrust on content development. Also, Netflix has turned down a counter offer but has accepted that this acquisition struggle will take longer than expected.
A sector that finds itself in a world of risk and uncertain outcomes
The struggle that Warner Bros. faces encapsulates how fragile the film industry, as a whole, is. There are no guarantees in art. Every successful film has dozens of unreleased films in it. The dysfunction has led Hollywood to resemble a Venture Capital model of entertainment, rather than a traditional form of it.
Intellectual property adds a certain stability for a certain period of time. Warner Bros. has exploited franchises such as Harry Potter, as well as franchises tied to DC, for a long, long period of time, leveraging revenue from film, consumer product, and theme park properties. Even franchises with successful IP, however, burn out.” Successful or not, Argento argues, all IP expires. Moreover, it does not matter how successful a firm in this sector, for example, a film producer, Argento argues that size can be a challenge in Hollywood. “Larger companies pay bigger talent costs, bigger marketing budgets, and bigger picture budgets,” Argento argues. This explains how massive mergers in Hollywood result in spectacular failures.
What would it take to create a Hollywood-quality film
A revolution in this industry occurred with the help of technology. There is a technology company that also distributes films, named Netflix, brought a huge change in how content is consumed. With a subscription-based model, it earned continuous revenues and acquired access to millions of viewers worldwide. Serving tens of millions of new viewers meant incurring minimal additional costs, as it started reaping economies of scale. This company believed that it could leverage this even in content creation. They started producing content in massive productions, relying on algorithm-driven suggestions, putting it all out in a season, which meant quantity overcame quality, and even popular content not remembered in a matter of days.
Amazon too faced similar challenges. Although it has been very efficient in terms of infrastructure, it has no choice but to purchase MGM in order for it to gain access to valuable IP. This is then followed by a different breed of disruptor in Skydance. This company, which was established by David Ellison, has used cloud animation technology along with other algorithm-driven approaches that make it a nimble and lean film studio. This has taken it a full two decades to finally place itself in a position where it has been able to purchase a massive stake in Paramount, which dates back to Hollywood history.
How Warner Bros. became vulnerable
However, Warner Bros. was a giant that kicked off this decade wounded from a series of ill-fated corporate marriages. A merger with AOL resulted in depleted assets. A buyout from AT&T imposed a heavy debt burden before it threw in the towel and left as a telecommunication giant. A merger with Discovery has imposed no sense of continuity. Meanwhile, Warner Bros. has been suffering from revenue declines in their cable business, a lack of cultural relevance for their IP, and a slow reaction to launch their competitor to Netflix in HBO Max.
Cost-reducing strategies further worsened the conditions. Warner Bros. scrapped near-final productions, chose renewed but old franchises, and invested in devalued IP. The value of the company from 2022 to 2024 suffered a sharp fall in the market. On the other hand, Warner faced some difficulties.
However, Netflix adapted. The company began showing advertisements, enforced stricter policies pertaining to password sharing, slowed down their content roll, and focused on popular titles as well as sports. In early 2025, Netflix had over 300 million subscribers and regained a market value exceeding that of Disney. Skydance, on the other hand, ensured a successful run with “Top Gun: Maverick,” without engaging in a costly race in the streaming world.
ALSO READ: Trump tariff threat escalates against India and Canada
A Future Hollywood That Keeps On Evolving
This unfolds the current bidding war. Netflix thinks that Warner Bros. can provide it with management of franchises worldwide, access to the world of gaming, and a complete form of entertainment. PSKY provides a new, innovative, and flexible Hollywood film studio, which restores the lack of creativity in Hollywood. Problems, though, are ahead for both. Warner Bros. has proven that even a successful business will disintegrate with poor management. This struggle has yet to reach an end. The winner of this struggle will start a new era in Hollywood, which, unlike previous ones, will be even more centralized, tech-driven, with creativity and data being in a fight. The end of this tale is yet to be written, and Hollywood has never faced a story like this.
FOR MORE: https://civiclens.in/category/category-business-economy/
About the Author
