Naval mine being one of the oldest weapons in navy warfare, it continues to become one of the most efficient tools for blocking global trade. Recent tensions in the Persian Gulf have led to increased focus on the chances that Iran might use sea mines in the Strait of Hormuz, which is a narrow waterway that about 20% of the world’s oil exports pass through.
Even a small amount of mines in the crucial waterway would disrupt shipping routes, raise the costs for tankers, and possibly create instability in the worldwide energy markets.
A simple but powerful weapon
Sea mines are simply explosive devices that are placed in the water and are triggered by the ships passing close by. Compared to torpedoes or missiles,Strait of Hormuz threatened by sea mines amid Iran war to make & remain out of sight for extended periods of time.
Iran has both moored mines – which are placed on the seafloor – as well as drifting mines that float just under the surface of the water. Some mines explode when they are physically struck by a ship that hits a protruding strike. Others have magnetic or acoustic triggers that explode when the ship passes overhead.
One example that analysts believe is frequently cited is Iran’s Maham-1 naval mine. This particular mine is designed to be used in shallow water and has the capability of being loaded with large quantities of explosives that can cause significant damage to vessels.
According to naval experts, the true power of mines lies not in the amount of damage they create but in the disruption that results from them. Even merely being suspected to be in an area may slow or completely stop shipping traffic from using it.
Asymmetric warfare in a strategic chokepoint
Analysts say, sea mines are one of the classic examples of asymmetric warfare. Those nations without strong navies can use mines—at a relatively low cost—to challenge stronger enemy fleets.
Iran could lay mines using small boats, fishing boats and trained divers, making detection nearly impossible. Iran is also reported to have limpet mines which can be applied by divers to the hulls of ships.
Because the Strait of Hormuz is narrow, a minefield even covering a small area of the shipping lane would cause many vessels to have to take another route or sit outside of the strait until naval forces could clear it.
ALSO READ: The Rising Cost of War: $11 Billion Spent in Days
A threat to the global energy market
The strategic significance of the Strait of Hormuz increases its threat level exponentially. This waterway connects the Gulf of Oman and the Persian Gulf, and is the main shipping lane for oil being exported from the three largest oil-producing nations in the world: Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates and Kuwait.
The threat posed by naval mines in this area is not simply theoretical. For example, during the Iran–Iraq War in the 1980s, both Iran and Iraq attacked oil tankers and infrastructure; that conflict is often referred to as the “Tanker War”.
The consequences of using mines were felt on April 14, 1988, when the USS Samuel B. Roberts, a US Navy frigate, struck an Iranian mine in the Persian Gulf, resulting in major retaliation from the US against Iranian naval forces.
Today, modern navies have advanced mine detection capabilities, which include sonar and unmanned vessels to locate and clear mines. However, removing mines is still a lengthy and complicated process.
According to experts, therefore, sea mines remain one of Iran’s most effective means of hindering maritime shipping—and potentially impacting the world’s economies.
FOR MORE: https://civiclens.in/category/international-news/
About the Author
