Australia leads the world with a ban on under-16s using large social media sites, and yet it appears that service Reddit will be taking its battle with these new guidelines to court. The California-based site launched its challenge on Friday with the assertion that the ban contravenes freedom of political communication.
According to court papers, Reddit believes that Australia’s Social Media Minimum Age Act breaks the country’s implied constitutional freedom of political expression. It also argued that there have been uneven interpretations and enforcement of these rules, with some platforms being prosecuted while others are exempt, like Roblox, Pinterest, and WhatsApp due to having young user demographics.
According to a statement issued by Reddit, they support youth safety but believe there are “serious privacy and political expression issues” raised with these new guidelines. The reason for these reservations is that third-party platforms would have no option but to obtain more information about people’s ages, thereby putting everyone, including minors and adults, at risk.
Although it launched the challenge, Reddit still complies with the law and continues working with the eSafety Commissioner in Australia.
Australia introduces strict new enforcement
According to the law, failure by platforms such as Reddit, Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, YouTube, X, and Snapchat to remove accounts of users below 16 years old would result in a penalty amounting to as much as A$49.5 million (US$33 million).
Regulations came into force this week, and as a reaction, the eSafety Commissioner began sending compulsory notifications requiring detailed reports on the number of child accounts that have been deactivated thus far. This will be done on these platforms every six months.
The government, led by Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, refuses to make any statements about the lawsuit filed by Reddit and instead emphasizes that it “puts Australian parents and kids, not platforms, first.”
New apps proliferate as teens seek loopholes
As enforcement begins, youth in Australia have already turned to alternative apps that have yet to be labeled as age-restricted. The downloads of Yope, a photo-sharing app for private groups of friends, increased by 251%, and Lemon8, an app belonging to ByteDance, increased by 88%.
· The eSafety Commissioner has asked these smaller platforms to determine if they are included in the new law. Included parties will have to exclude people below 16 years or suffer consequences.
It is warned that there could be a “Whack-a-Mole” problem with regulating age limits on social media platforms because new social media platforms might soon appear on the scene.
privacy tensions escalate due to age verification
Although there is no directive on how a platform is supposed to check the age, some methods have been suggested:
requesting ID documents
with third-party facial age estimation software
examining behavioural data that already exists on platforms
However, it has been emphasized by the government that making it mandatory for all users to share identification would be an invasion of their privacy. It has been made compulsory that no platform can make users share identification issued by the government.
Free speech groups enter the fray
The lawsuit follows a previous challenge brought last month by the Digital Freedom Project on behalf of two 15-year-old plaintiffs. Both suits contend that the ban impacts the freedom and abilities of young people to engage with political and societal conversations on the internet.
A preliminary hearing before the High Court will take place at the end of February. Whether these will be tried together remains unclear.
ALSO READ: Hollywood’s billion-dollar battle: How Netflix and Paramount Skydance are vying with Warner Bros
Global case study at Protecting Children Online
Australia’s experiment with online safety is being widely followed internationally. Other nations, such as New Zealand and Malaysia, have already begun thinking about imposing similar online bans as they become increasingly worried about detrimental online content and “predatory algorithms” that target youth.
The Albanese government admits that there will be no perfect system and that it will not be long before teens find ways around these rules. However, they believe that something needs to be done about cyberbullying, explicit images, and online manipulation.
But ahead of that, it has caused a big battle in the legal scene as it marks the first instance in the world that people below 16 are barred from social media.
FOR MORE: https://civiclens.in/category/international-news/
About the Author
